联系我们  |  工作机会  |  香港  |  English
视频
官方微博
您的位置: 首页 > 资讯中心
救助儿童会(中国项目)全纳教育项目中期评估公开招标书

救助儿童会(中国项目)全纳教育项目中期评估公开招标书

 

救助儿童会(中国项目)拟通过公开招标,寻找可以承担此项评估工作的机构和个人。 招标相关背景见评估岗位职责说明书(附件1),在此不再重复说明。

 

  1. 招标名称:救助儿童会(中国项目)全纳教育项目中期评估招标书

     

2.投标资格:

2.1 投标机构应合法注册,并具有开展相关专业领域工作的资格;

2.2投标个人应具有在残障儿童教育进行调查研究的资格;

2.3具有开展相关专业领域研究的专业背景。

 

3. 投标文件:

3.1 投标机构应提交机构注册文件、机构介绍,技术支持能力以及既往经验介绍

3.2 细化任务书,包括工作方法

3.3 详细的活动方案和预算

3.4 投标文件以电子邮件的形式发送给救助儿童会联系人员

3.5需提供机构联系人的多种联系方式,以便于招标人随时与投标人进行澄清相关信息。

 

4.截止时间: 2017年9月28日。

 

5. 其他:救助儿童会收到相关的投标文件后将确定最后的中标方,中标方需与救助儿童会签订服务协议。

 

6.投标方式:

6.1将2份纸质版的投标文件邮寄至:

  • 北京市朝阳区建外外交公寓2号楼2单元052

  • 联系人:王女士

  • 联系电话: +86 10 8532 3228-506

6.2将电子版的投标文件于截止日期前,发送至邮箱:  xingxing.wang@savethechildren.org

 

7. 联系方式:

      地址:北京市朝阳区建外外交公寓2号楼2单元052邮编:100600

联系人:王女士 +86 10 8532 3228 - 506

Web: www.savethechildren.org.cn

 

 

 

 

详情请查看以下附件

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

附件1

 

 

TERMS OF REFERENCE

FOR

Education for All: An Inclusive Education for Children with Disabilities in China

Project Mid-Term EVALUATION

 

  1. Project Background

Project name: Education for All:  An Inclusive Education for Children with Disabilities in China

Project areas:

  • Yunnan Province: County, Jingdong County, Weishan County

  • Sichuan Province: Wuhou Disctrict and Pi County in Chengdu City

  • Beijing, Chengdu and Kunming (for Expected Output 2. Please see below)

     

    Start and end date: 1st January, 2016 to 31st December, 2018

     

    Implementing partners:

  • Special Education Branch of The Chinese Society of Education (SEBCSE)

  • Education Bureaus of 4 project Counties

     

     

    Project goal: Children with disabilities have access to and attend good quality inclusive education in China.

    Objective 1: The community-based model for inclusive education is further strengthened at the county-level in two counties in Sichuan Province and two counties in Yunnan Province.

    Objective 2: The quality of teacher education is improved, with a focus on establishing inclusive education curricula in university and college programs.

Objective 3: Advocating to establish an enabling environment to mainstream inclusive education in China.

  1. Purpose of the evaluation

The mid-term evaluation aims to assess progress in the achievement of the objectives and recommend refinement of the implementation arrangements and changes to enhance results achievement. It will also analyses success factors and lessons learnt to inform other stakeholders.

The evaluator will carry out a mid-term evaluation on Inclusive Education Project to the following areas:

 

      • Assess if the project generally progresses in line with the proposed plan, identify success factors as well as lessons learnt and provide suggestions for improvement.

      • Review the project management structure and approaches and provide suggestions for improvement.

         

Objective 1: The community-based model for inclusive education is further strengthened at the county-level in two counties in Sichuan Province and two counties in Yunnan Province.

  1. Review if the activities planned and delivered are sufficient to achieve the expected objectives and making impact according to the 5 KPIs.

  2. Analyse if implementation partners (provincial, municipal or county education bureaus in Sichuan, and Yunnan) fully understand the objectives, activities and expected results of the project and if they are fully playing their roles as agreed with Save the Children and suggest better ways of holding implementing partners accountable for the action.

     

Objective 2: The quality of teacher education is improved, with a focus on establishing inclusive education curricula in university and college programs.

  1. Find out if the cooperative partner (SEBCSE) is striving to develop IE curriculum for college students relevant to the local context, and keep a sustainable technical support.

  2. Suggest Save the Children on how to better monitor the progress.

     

Objective 3: Advocating establishing an enabling environment to mainstream inclusive education in China.

  1. Evaluate if the policy advocacy activities are carried out efficiently to impact policy maker to promote inclusive education and if the advocacy led to any changes in IE relevant policy.

  2. Assess if the national level IE campaign raise the public awareness and changing harmful social stigmas;

 

  1. Tasks and Methodologies

 

Before the actual work carried out, the evaluator will:

 

  • Set up the evaluation group with explicit roles and responsibilities for evaluating.

  • Comment on and finalise working schedule, field visit itinerary, etc.

  • Prepare evaluation tools, including qualitative and quantitative analysis comparing with IE base line survey, such as interview questions, questionnaires together with the program manager

  • Prepare evaluation plan mentioning stakeholders

 

The evaluation will be conducted with combination of desk review, field visits and interviews. The evaluator is expected to complete the assignment in the following sequence:

  • Review relevant documents and other literatures, such as baseline evaluation report, publication of projects.

  • Make field visits to in Beijing, Yunnan and Chengdu to review experience on the ground.  

  • Interviews with programme staff and project partners; and meet with children, parents, government officials, universities, etc.

  • Write the report and recommendations, share mid-term evaluation report for IKEA and final evaluation report for JFT with SC and the project’s stakeholders both in Chinese and English.

Regarding the description of objectives of the evaluation, Save the Children attaches great value to validity, reliability and usability of the mid-term report.

•      Validity. The evaluation report has to bear a clear description of the methods used, including shortcomings of the evaluation.

•      Reliability. The conclusions have to be reliable; sources of information should be included with as far as possible verification of its reliability. The evaluating sample has to be justified and/or the case study selection has to be described. An analysis of the comments of stakeholders and the supervision process by Save the Children should be included in the report.

•      Usability. The findings and conclusions of the evaluation have to be applicable for the stakeholders involved. It is important that the conclusions and recommendations are separated in the report, clearly formulated and realistic.

During the evaluation following questions should be assessed:

  • accountability to both children and partners

  • efficiency of implementation

  • effectiveness

  • impact

  • future actions

  1. Outputs and Deliverable

 

The evaluator is expected take three kind of meetings with SC. They are

  • Planning meeting, before evaluation

  • Review meeting after the field visit and

  • Sharing meeting after finishing the draft of the report.

 

After completion of the tasks, the evaluator is expected to produce a report with the template of SC, which need summarise key findings of the evaluation and recommendation, and recommend future development of the projects of Save the Children China Programme.

The evaluation report will be disseminated internal and to partners, their feedback and suggestions will collected for revision and finalization of the final evaluation report.

 

The report should be with Chinese version and English Version

 

  1. Qualification

 

  • The experts should have a team to carry out the evaluation.

  • The experts should be able to conduct evaluation with participatory method.

  • The experts should have rich experience in education of children with disabilities in China and Inclusive Education

  • Expertise in quantitative and qualitative program evaluation.

  • The experts should understand human rights concept and development.

  • The experts should provide the evidence that the consultant team or individual has the ability to conduct this evaluation.  

  • The experts should be excellent in written and spoken English.

 

  1. Timeframe for evaluation process

Desk review: October 13, 2017 to October 18, 2017 

Field research and meeting with partners: October 23, 2017 to November 3, 2017

Deadline for submission of draft evaluation report:   By November 10, 2017

Deadline for submission of final evaluation report:   By November 20, 2017.

Final evaluation report sharing with SC and stakeholders:   by November 27, 2017.

  1. Working contacts

 

The evaluator will work with the staff of IE project’s team, and report to Inclusive Education Manager.